PM: Hwi Gue
Def. policy recommending turning off the main light
First: propose the growth of teenagers
7~8 hours of sleep is necessary – do their work during day
Second: reduce the amount of energy used
Overuse of light and energy in a isolated region can be dangerous
After all, the policy is only recommendation and students can freely maintain light on their own
LO: Seohyun
# Rebut
We can’t sleep because we have too much work load
Turn off light when we actually go to sleep
Can’t save energy in any significant amount since it is voluntary
First: no participation of students
In autonomous student government, this decision is ironic in that we sought for more sovereignty
Hinder effective use of time
We have a lot to do
DPM: Joowon
When light is on, students are not burdened to study
turning off light can make students who don't have much to do go to sleep
Small electric generator and limited amount of electricity in the school
The policy is only recommendation and it is a great benefit
We can flexibly use our time by maintaining the light when we have things to do
DLO: Celine
If penalty points come into policy - it means the policy is a must
the electric generator is out of question because it ran well before the policy was implemented
we need much more time than 12
GW: Ryan
1. how this is recommendation?
lights on at 12:30 and dorm parent told to turn the light on
we don't get penalty points
2. inconsistent team stand
they say they love democracy and want to follow rules that they choose
however they are still following the 2am light out policy - it is inconsistent
3. the opposition does not understand our points
OW: Yong Wook
1. legitimacy
keep claiming that it is only recommendation
abrupt change - no participation of students and penalty points for whom do not take the policy
Good to see your flow sheet. I think the one I provide on my blog is easier to follow though. These aren't graded but do count towards class participation if I see them. Nice work.
답글삭제